charhf Character in Huckleberry Finn Essay -- Adventures Huckleberry

The Importance of Character in The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn Mark Twain’s novel The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn is one of the world’s most acclaimed books. Twain accomplishes this with his extraordinary power of humor, his use of dialect, and by creating complex and unique characters. Developing his characters is one of the greatest assets he has in The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. A character that exemplifies this most is Huck Finn, first appearing as rouge, but later transforming into a character with high moral values. Early on in The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, we see Huck as a rogue figure. He jokes about killing people, and he insists that it must be fun. The idea of a gang seems good to Huck and all the other boys, so they all decide to "take an oath and write [their] name in blood" (Twain, 9). All of them are now part of this vicious gang and swear "to kill the families of boys that told secrets" (Twain, 9). The whole idea of doing things that are written about in books excites Huck, so he sticks with this plan and follows Tom; that is, until he gets on the river. On the river, Huck and Jim are free of the society that binds them. Jim is free and does not bear any of the prejudices of the world that plague him on the shore, says Ben Christensen. Jim does not have to live in fear of being beaten for being himself and he does not have to worry about being called stupid. Also, he says that Huck is allowed to think for himself here -- unshaped by the thoughts of society. He is always saying how Jim does not act like any other black he had been told about. Huck’s morality prevails on the river (Christensen). There are many spots on the river where Huck... ...oke can hurt no matter what race a person is. Huck knows the difference between right and wrong and knows to stay away from wrong. Huck also knows the importance of friendship and is willing to go to Hell to preserve the friendship between himself and Jim. Even though he does not show his moral traits, Huck is a moral character whether he likes it or not. Works Cited Christensen, Ben. Huck Finn’s Contention With The Values Of Society. Online. February, 1995: http://internet.ocii.com/~benjc/essay/english/huckfinn.html. Pain, Albert. Huck Finn Comes into His Own. Online. 1999: http://marktain.miningco.com/library/biography/bl_paine_ch153.htm. Rasmussen, Kent. Mark Twain A to Z: The Essential Reference to his life and Writings. New York: Facts on File, Inc., 1995. Twain, Mark. The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. New York: Bantam Books, 1884.

gay people Essay -- essays research papers

The topic I picked is Homosexual people should have the right and the freedom like what straight people have in this world. I think this topic is very controversial because in the U.S. Most homosexual people especially males, get discriminated because of what they feel: having attractiveness to their same sex. Most people in the U.S. are str8 and most people think that being gay or lesbian is wrong and it is not right to show it off and be proud of it. Another point why this topic is very controversial is when gay people marry each other. Many people believe and many religions believe it is very wrong to marry the same sex person. For example in the Roman Catholic followings. The church is totally against gay and lesbian relationships, because it if you do follow the gay and lesbian side its considered a big sin because in the teachings of GOD and Jesus you have to be with the opposite sex so you can make life.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  The 2 perspectives that are drawn on this topic is that the 1st perspective is that you see the topic as very reasonable. For instance you do agree with the topic and you do want to follow what it says. The 2nd perspective is that you disagree with the topic and say that gay and lesbians should have the rights or as much freedom as straight people because they are â€Å"different† than most people.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  The side that I want to represent is the one that I am with the perspective that sees that gay and lesbians should have the freedom to do whatever they want and with whom ever they want.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  To me I am not gay myself, and I do not have any problems with these kinds of people. As long as they do not touch I’m cool with them. The reason I support the 1st perspective is because in this country the U.S. it is a free country and you can do whatever you want that is not crime committed or have to do anything that kills other people.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Homosexual people do not have the freedom, yet they still fight for their right to be homosexual. People around the U.S. are against the homosexual concept. What I do not understand is why do you have to be against this gay and lesbian concept in the 1st place? 1st of all what to do homosexuals have to do in your life; they do not interfere into you personal life. So why do you have to discriminate and make fun of the peo... ...ot see the side of whom they are inside, but they only see what they are.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  A lot of people judge each other by a different number of things. But the most discrimination next to racism is homosexuality. The reason a lot of people think it is wrong because they think it is sick and it is not normal for other people to see homosexuals kissing or engaging in sexual intercourse.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Overall Homosexuals have it hard in the U.S. but not only here but around the world, some countries or religions kill people if they are gay. What I think about that is that I think it’s very wrong and people do not realize that being gay is very hard, and they can’t be put in their shoes to see how it is. The whole problem is that people of different aspects or view have been discriminated because of what they believe in and what they want to act in. So what I want to say is that homosexuals should have the same equal rights and the same amount of freedom as straight people because in this world it does not matter who, what you are, but it does matter how you contribute to this world and how people make it a better place.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  

Corporate Governance In Australia Essay

INTRODUCTION Corporate governance is the process by which the corporate can implement proficient decision making, appropriate resource allocation, and involve in strategic planning. It concentrates on how objects of are laid down and attained, how risk is watched and evaluated and how performance are maximized. Corporate governance helps corporations to construct value through innovation, provide accountability and to implement proper control system to quantify the risk involved. Corporate governance has become more relevance to determine the cost of capital in a global capital market. So as to facilitate the Australian companies to compete internationally and to preserve and promote investor’s reliability both in Australia and overseas, corporate governance is to ensure to review those practices to reflect both local and international developments and position. Corporate governance must be evolutionary and receptive to the information requirements of local and international investors. In Australia, Corporate governance has been defined by two chief guides viz. ‘Corporate Practices and Conduct ‘issued by the Bosch Committee in 1995 and ‘A guide for Investment Managers and Corporations â€Å"issued by IFSA in 1997 and also by ASX publications and the Australian Institute of Directors. Most definitions on corporate governance refer mainly the following: The devise by which companies are controlled and directed and The devise by which those who control and direct a company are supervised. FUNDAMENTALS OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: To explain the functions of the management and the board clearly. The Board is vested with a balance of skills and independence. More emphasis on the honesty on decision makers on corporate’s plan and financial performance. To inform periodically the investors the important happenings in corporate financial activity and enhances the integrity of the corporate reporting. To report all material factors in time and with a matured outlook. The shareholder’s rights shall be clearly acknowledged and to be honored. Business decisions with inherent risk and uncertainty is to be handled with proper internal control. To cope with the modern risks of business, introduction of formal mechanisms to enhance board’s and managerial effectiveness. Proper rewarding system should be designed to attract skills required to achieve the result anticipated by shareholders. Good governance takes care of the interest of all stakeholders . In Australia, relevant disclosures are made in a separate corporate governance section of the annual report of a company. Australian Corporate Act requires certain information is to be included in the director’s report and these informations can be included in the corporate governance section in the annual report of the corporation. The main general salient features of corporate governance codes are: It is the way of guaranteeing that the implementation of economic power by the corporate sector. Board of Directors of a corporation has inherent managerial and supervisory function. It ensures that there is a demarcation between managerial and supervisory roles. It includes the separation of the office of the Chairman and CEO, the installation of independent directors, formation of committees of Board like remuneration, audit, share transfer etc. Major codes of the corporate governance deals with disclosures to shareholders more particularly director’s remuneration, top executive remuneration, independence of directors and shareholding pattern etc. Thus corporate governance is aimed at the maximization of shareholders wealth and to protect their interests. While the corporate governance is helpful to instill confidence on investors and at the same time if there are grave governance deficiencies, the investors may shun the shares of individual companies, a section of markets or even national capital markets. Westpac Banking corporation of Australia has not only stood top of the Australian corporate governance league race in 2004 but also only the bank on international level to enter into the global top 20 corporates as appraised by Governance Metrics International , an International rating agency.[1] The annual IR Magazine Australia awards for   2005 had been awarded to the following Australian companies for their best corporate governance in investor relations by ASX 100 company viz. ANZ , BHP Billion , Blue Scope Steel, and Stock land.[2] COMPARISON BETWEEN CORPORATE GOVERNANCEANDCORPORATE RESPONSIBILITIES: The recent scandals in US like Enron, WorldCom, and Adelphia has compelled the governments across the world to promulgate enhanced legislation, improved corporate codes and corporate boards have been â€Å"re-balanced† to have more independent directors. Corporate responsibility is nothing but the extension of governance beyond simple compliance to squeeze wider social values. A recent survey finds that of late more business heads and corporate investors are factoring corporate responsibility into their decision making process. Thus the corporate responsibility has become vital or pivotal consideration in investment decisions. As per views of business heads, corporate responsibility should include ethical staff behavior, good corporate governance and transparency where as for investors, transparency, good corporate governance and ethical staff behavior were the top most concern.   Further it is revealed that corporate responsibility could augment corporate’s bottom line and resulted in intangible advantages of brand enhancement and better staff morale but it has disadvantages also like unproven business benefits and high cost involved . The Role of ASIC (Australian Securities & Investment Commission) in corporate governance: The ASIC mainly supervises and enforces compliance with the various provisions of the Australian Corporations Act that are devised to control and influence the exercise of power by top managers and directors. The major supervision provisions include duties of directors, general meetings of the company shareholders, and transactions with the related parties. But the full compliance by the corporates can not be possible unless there exists adequate enforcement mechanism. Hence support of the government is needed for the enforcement mandate of their securities market. ASIC has successfully through its various ranges of enforcement measures have brought a series of civil, administrative and criminal actions to bring accountability to wrongdoers. Former CFO of Harris Scarfe was sentenced to 6 year imprisonment in a criminal charges leveled against him by ASIC[3]. Likewise, civil penalty proceedings were initiated against erstwhile directors of HIH. Court held that they breached their duties as directors under the Australian Corporations Act and debarred them to involve in the management of company affairs for 20 years and 10 years.Further, these erstwhile directors were directed to pay compensation of more than A $7 million and also Court imposed pecuniary penalties in each case. Further ASIC is contemplating actions in more than 200 cases most of which mainly concerned with issues relating to failed governance. Further, more than 69 persons were imprisoned for committing white collar crimes from 1999 to 2002. ASIC tries to enforce the corporate codes by compelling to make disclosures, the operation of exchanges (where listing arrangement also requires corporate governance compliances), the directives on audit and licensing of intermediaries. Comparison of Corporate Governance between USA and Australia. In the post-Enron era, the main difference is the USA’s perspective rule based approach and Australia’s more flexible principle-centered approach. Moreover, in Australia, there are array of menu of regulatory and other official standards for business. These includes Australian Corporation Act, regulatory guidelines such as ASX corporate governance council’s best practice ‘suggestions on corporate governance , regulatory ruling like ATO rulings ,regulatory guidelines like ASTC policy statements and practice notes, official standard-setting and judicial pronouncements. [i] Most of SOX provisions are identical to Australian laws and regulations such as CLERP 9 and the ASX corporate governance guidelines. Australia’s corporate governance guidelines are designed mainly for the Australian companies and its stock market and it is user-friendly. ASX corporate governance guidelines and CLERP 9 contains certain SOX governance conditions. It is to be noted that thought there is no 100% identical nature but its intent and objectives are more or less identical. There is a marked difference in approach between USA[4] and Australia towards corporate governance as the former is adopting ‘rule-based’ where as the latter is adopting ‘principle-based’ approach. Australian corporate governance is of suggestive in nature whereas USA is following prescriptive nature to governance matters. Thus the suggestive nature provides an in-built elasticity to retort and adjust to local industry and market forces and too industry ‘best practices’. Though the objective of some US and Australian governance is identical, the expressions applied are different thereby making strict compliance more complex. Further, relationships between Australian companies and their external auditors may be viewed by the SEC of USA as a violation of US auditor independence standards and may result in major penalties regardless the fact it complies with the Australian governance standards. This is to be considered if an Australian company is listed in the US. In the case of auditor independence, Australian â€Å"general independence ‘code is somewhat relaxed than the comprehensive list of specific preclusions under SOX. In US, in addition to annual and quarterly financial reports, a listed company has to file periodic reports on material ‘off-balance sheet ‘transactions. Further, it requires personal certification by the CEO or CFO that reports do not include any untrue statements or material omissions and reporting of changes of ownership status.    Under ASX listing rules and Corporations Act of Australia, a listed company has to file continuous disclosures to instill confidence for investors and facilitate them to have timely access to price sensitive information which have an effect on corporate’s securities. Australian governance codes specify lesser specific responsibility on periodic reporting. Where as under SOX, periodic disclosure is easy to implement as it specifies what are to be to reported every financial quarter and not contemplating to report what is materially price-sensitive which has to be disclosed on continuously under ASX codes. Under US governance codes, stringent and rigid set of prohibitions are placed on external auditors and audit functions which is in line with the US ‘rules based approach’. In contrast, CLERP 9 requires Australian public companies and their external auditors to exhaustive codes concerning auditor independence and fortifies existing auditor independence requirements through a recently introduced set of codes on auditor independence, periodic rotation of audit partners, placing restrictions on employment relations between the client and the auditor and imposing mandatory cooling off period before members of an audit firm can become a officer or director of the client. The main difference lies between Australian ‘general independence test’ which is somewhat liberal than the specific preclusions under SOX. Under SOX, CEO or CFO has to certify that they have reviewed the relevant financial report and it is not misleading or contain untrue information’s and there exists enough internal controls. In Australia, CLERP 9 mandates that CFO or CEO should provide a written certification on financial statements which is to be addressed to Board of Directors and not to the market itself. Thus the Board of directors assumes definitive authority by way of director’s declaration made in accordance with the board’s resolutions as a part of corporates annual financial report. ROLE OF DIRECTORS IN CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN AUSTRALIA: In one of the study conducted by the Australian Council of Super investors reveals that about 61% of Non-executive directors appointed in 2005 in S&P / ASX 100 companies were found to be holding directorships with S&P / ASX 100 companies already in Australia .This shows that holding directorship in S&P / ASX 100 companies is the pre-qualification to act as NED in Australian companies. Study also reveals that there is steady increase in the appointment of NED in Australian companies. About 62% of female directors of ASX listed companies found to be holding more than one board as compared to an average of 41% for males. Remuneration package for the NED services is on the increase and about on average received about $ 154,170 in remuneration for director’s service in Australia. Court decisions in Australia have detailed and explained what is required of a director. A director should have a fundamental objectives of the business in which the company is involved. A director should be aware of the recent happenings in the company and hence it becomes compulsory on the part of the director to attend the board meeting regularly. Directors should develop a familiarity with the financial status of the company and frequently review its financial reports. A director may be appointed as whole time director due to his expertise knowledge and in such events, he has the duty to evince attention to the company’s affairs that might rationally be estimated to attract inquiry. A study conducted by UTS centre for corporate governance in Australia in June 2006 reveals that all the participating Australian companies in the study had included short biographies of their directors in their annual report as demanded by the Australian Corporations Act, 2001. The average size of the Board is 8 with minimum of 4 and the maximum of 14. Majority of board were comprises of independent, non-executive directors and almost only one executive director in the Board. The ASX study of corporate governance practice disclosure in 2005 revealed that about 47% of companies had not complied with inclusion of independent directors in the Board. As per ASIC report issued during October, 2006, it will check the company’s ASX announcements in case if the company has a market cap of less $500m and if it is engaged in the mining, biotech or energy sectors. Further, ASIC is seriously considering its role to make sure that ASX announcements are accurate and timely. As result of this, the director’s responsibility towards corporate governance has become more accountable. While the ASIC’s authority to impose fines for breaches in the continuous disclosures is more relevant in forcing the corporations to adhere the governance standards, it is also toothed with other regulatory measures as per details given below: ASX has recently requested that Cudeco to clarify its explorations results. A suit was initiated against Jubilee Mining NL for $1.8m by one of its shareholders for late disclosure. The federal Court imposed on Chemeq Ltd a $500,000 penalty plus cost for having botched to disclose the increase in cost of construction in its manufacturing facility and the lack of commercial significance of the grant of a US patent. In the case of ASIC v. HIH Insurance Ltd, Supreme Court of New South Wales found that there was violation by the directors and breach of duty under the corporations Act. Rodney Adler was found to breach his duty as director under section 180,181, 182, and 183 of the Australian Corporation Act and Dominic Fodera was found to be breached the section 180.   Further the Court held that payment of $ 10 million to a related party violated the related party provisions as well as the Australian Corporation Act, 2001 dealing with the extending financial help in the purchase of its parent’s shares. CONCLUSIONS: Australian governance laws and regulations are not prescriptive in nature and instead they recognize that diverse governance structures coincide better for different entities.   Since US have introduced tougher corporate governance codes, the Australia may follow the suit in very near future. In Australia, disclosure is required both periodic and on continuous basis. For instance, all listed companies to disclose well in advance the price sensitive information to the market operator who will then make it available to market participants. However there is lack of severe penalties in case of breaches for disclosure. Thus taking advantage to this loophole, most of the corporates want to avail this as a justification to shun disclosures. The Australian corporations should cope with the international developments on corporate governance. The board should be made aware what is being happening in the overseas. Some argue that the corporate governance is nothing but a cultural issue and in achieving the governance, one has to battle with human nature every day. To obviate these breaches, it is recommended that ASIC should be toothed with more powers to levy administrative fines.   This would definitely augment suppleness, cost-effectiveness and appropriateness of remedies. This will also strengthen the integrity of the law by offering an impartial remedy for conduct that is otherwise absent. It is reported that present disclosure obligations under listing rules is of ambiguous in nature mainly pertaining to the continuous disclosure obligations.   It is necessary to redraft the listing rules to explain the existing exclusions, transforming the balance in favor of disclosures in all but under short circumstances. With the template reviews advocated by the 2003 Uhrig Report which is well under consideration, it is necessary to pause and hold in mind that governance is a means to an end. Proper implementation of governance will contribute to social and economic welfare through efficiency, ethical behavior and competitiveness. It maximizes the profit in the private sector and it monitors the expenditure of pubic monies in public sector. It has become also need of the hour to reintroduce the obligation on the part of a company to respond market rumors in specific situations.   One has to take into cognizance non-accountability of press who publish false rumors thereby triggering movement of share price in the market which creates a not informed and uninformed market. Thus it has become corporates onus to intervene and to augment the market’s state of knowledge. Thus the Corporate governance is the tool to redress the conflicts of interest between various ‘role players’ in the industry and encourages them to share more responsibilities to adhere corporate accountability. [1] http://www.iccwbo.org/corporate-governance/id3615/index.html [2] Awards for best investor relations by Australian companies , JCN Newswires , Septemeber,19,2005. [3] http://www.asic.gov.au/asic/ASIC.NSF/byid/B285C74C43B87CBBCA256FDC00818039?opendocument [4] Dale, Luke, â€Å"Australian Companies and Sarbanes-Oxley: Governance regulations in a parallel universe, Publication, Keeping Good Companies. [i] Dale, Luke, â€Å"Australian Companies and Sarbanes-Oxley: Governance regulations in a parallel universe, Publication, Keeping Good Companies. Brada, Josef C., and Inderjit Singh. 1999. Corporate Governance in Central Eastern Europe: Case Studies of Firms in Transition. Edited by Josef C. Brada, Saul Estrin, Josef C. Brada, Alan Gelb, Inderjit Singh, Josef C. Brada, Inderjit Singh, Saul Estrin, Xavier Richet, Josef C. Brada, and Inderjit Singh. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe. Francis, Ronald D. 2000. Ethics and Corporate Governance: An Australian Handbook. Sydney, N.S.W.: University of New South Wales Press. Hollingsworth, Kathryn, and Fidelma White. 1999. Audit, Accountability, and Government. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Power, Michael. 1997. The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Sherman, Hugh, and Rajeswararao Chaganti. 1998. Corporate Governance and the Timeliness of Change: Reorientation in 100 American Firms. Westport, CT: Quorum Books. Stapledon, G. P. 1996. Institutional Shareholders and Corporate Governance. Oxford: Clarendon Press.    Strathern, Marilyn, ed. 2000. Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics, and the Academy. London:    Bryan, Dick. 2000. The Rush to Regulate: The Shift in Australia from the Rule of Markets to the Rule of Capital. Australian Journal of Social Issues 35, no. 4: 333.    Business Focus; the Imperatives of Developing an Enterprise-Wide Risk Management and Governance Framework. 2004. Manila Bulletin, 21 June, NA.    Cheverton, Jeff. 2005. Past Their Peak? Governance and the Future of Peak Bodies in Australia. Australian Journal of Social Issues 40, no. 3: 427+.    Des Horts, Charles-Henri Besseyre. 2002. Governance, Knowledge Creation, and Organizing: An Afterthought. Human Resource Planning 25, no. 4: 48+.       Fort, Timothy L., and Cindy A. Schipani. 2003. Adapting Corporate Governance for Sustainable Peace. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 36, no. 2: 377+.    Gourevitch, Peter A. 2003. Political Determinants of Corporate Governance: Political Context, Corporate Impact. Yale Law Journal 112, no. 7: 1829+.    Kay, John, and Aubrey Silberston. 1995. Corporate Governance. National Institute Economic Review.    Marks, Robert E. 2002. Corporate Governance, or Where Does Ownership Lie? Australian Journal of Management 27, no. 2: i+.    Paredes, Troy A. 2004. A Systems Approach to Corporate Governance Reform: Why Importing U.S. Corporate Law Isn’t the Answer. William and Mary Law Review 45, no. 3: 1055+.    Vancea, Minodora D. 2003. Exporting U.S. Corporate Governance Standards through the Sarbanes-Oxley Act: Unilateralism or Cooperation? Duke Law Journal 53, no. 2: 833+.

A brief comparison between characters Essay

In the start we see that the two children of Mr and Mrs Birling(Sheila and Eric), support their parents in the beginning. Their character was exactly mirrored their parents view. Gerald however, is remains the same and refuses to change his character and is the same as Mr and Mrs Birling. This is not so obvious in the beginning, but if u study the book really carefully, you would see that there are many quotes that suggest that Gerald Croft was always in support of Mr. Birling, such as â€Å"Yes, exactly so† and so on. Mr Birling also goes on to tell Gerald and Eric â€Å"how a man should know how to look after himself†. This shows Mr Birling lack of civic mindedness and how emphasises on how selfish he is. There are also other instances on how selfish he is. For example, when he only cares for his knighthood and his reputation when news gets round of his family causing Eva to commit suicide. There is also no doubt that he is a unfeeling man when he shows no regret and remorse when he sacked Eva. Rather, he feels that he was not responsible for Eva Smith’s death. Mrs. Birling had almost a 100 percent mirror of Mr. Birling except that she flexes her muscles as head of the charity organization to refuse help to Eva Smith. She felt that it was impertinent of Eva to call herself Mrs Birling. Furthermore, she was a liar (as her children soon found out) as she had refused to acknowledge the photo of Eva and was adamant about not having met her. However after repeated questioning, she admitted that Eva had came to her for help before. She is also in the dark about Eric’s drinking habit and realizes that Sheila is not as pure as Mrs. Birling thought she was (â€Å"ran away with only a torn blouse†¦Ã¢â‚¬  â€Å"Shelia!†). This goes to show that Mrs Birling does not understand her children well enough to reveal their characters. Sheila had been thought to be a simple-minded girl and who was always excited. However after tonight, she became a changed person. She became the opposite of her parents and her views contradict the views of her parents. She felt that she was solely responsible that Eva had committed suicide. However, she knew the â€Å"importance† of civic mindedness when she discovers  that all of the Birlings and Gerald had each played a part to help in killing her. Sheila is also perceptive when she says that the inspector â€Å"he’s giving us the rope – so that we’ll hang ourselves†. This shows that she thinks deeply and with consideration. In this way, she becomes wiser at the end of the play and views things from a different angle. Gerald is seen as a dynamic character, who switches his â€Å"face† again and again so that we view different angles of him. In the start, he agrees with everything Mr. Birling about civic mindedness and all that nonsense. Our impression of him at the start is a man who has a lack of civic mindedness and indifference. However, we see a change in his character when he comes clean on having a relationship with Eva. But there is just one flaw, when the Inspector leaves and he comes back, he tells them that there was no such Inspector. When it was confirmed with a phone call to the Colonel Roberts, he breathes a heavy sigh of relief. Does this show that he was hypocritical and only wanted to get off the hook? For Eric, we can see that he contradicts with whatever his father says. Even at the end, he argues with his father daringly. It is not sure whether he had argued with on the basis of spiting him or to really show his true feelings on how his father had treated Eva. He also shows remorse when he says â€Å"we did her in all right†. He also stands strong on Sheila’s side on how it did not matter whether the Inspector was a fraud. What was important was that they had all did something wrong even if the girls were different.

Abraham Van Helsing Essay Example for Free

Abraham Van Helsing Essay Bram Stoker (35) , Lucy Westenra (6) , Count (5) company About StudyMoose Contact Careers Help Center Donate a Paper Legal Terms & Conditions Privacy Policy Complaints ? Innocence, chastity, purity, and married life are just a few things that made up the ‘image’ of the nineteenth century Victorian woman. During this time, it was greatly looked down upon if a woman chose to stay single, as she would be pitied and dubbed a â€Å"whore†. Lucy Westenra is one of the main characters in the novel, Dracula by Bram Stoker. Lucy is a beautiful young lady whose innocence and virtuous being draws three suitors to her. Although, this portrayed innocence is not the only thing that is drawing these men towards her. Lucy has a sexual appeal to her personality, much different than her best friend Mina Murray and the typical Victorian woman. This sense of sexual desire will eventually lead her right into the dangerous and evil arms of Count Dracula. The Count only has the ability to attack willing victims, which is why the sexually driven Victorian woman, Lucy Westenra is the first character to become victimized by Dracula’s deadly spell. Count Dracula was an evil, lustful vampire who wanted nothing but power and control. He lived in an Eastern European country called, Transylvania. The Count preyed on any individual who would make him feel in control and powerful of the situation. This is why Lucy Westenra was targeted and made Dracula’s first victim. The first peculiar account Lucy and Mina experience was when they see a Russian ship wrecked near the shore and hear that the there was no life aboard and the captain had died holding a crucifix in his hands. Soon after the account, Lucy started mysteriously sleep walking many night in a row into the grave yard near her home. One night, Mina had awoken the Rowatt 3 find Lucy missing and not in her bed, she then found her outside with a creature with beaming red eyes hunched over her. Mina tried to save her friend but by the time she got over there, the creature was gone. In the morning Mina had found strange dots on Lucy’s neck and after struggling for weeks Lucy became deathly sick and started to change before everyone’s eyes. Unknowingly, she was transforming into a super natural and dangerous form of herself while dead and lying in a cold grave. â€Å"Indeed, it is not only Lucy and Mina who are dramatically transformed in the draining, but Dracula himself, whose transformations are much more varied and complex than those of his victims.† (Pg. 238, Viragh) Count Dracula had stripped this woman of her innocence and virtue by changing her to an evil vampire just like him. Dracula now had control over Lucy but only because she was willing to let him control her. In the nineteenth century, straying away from who a woman is supposed to be according to the Roman Catholic Church is heresy. A woman was never to be with more than one man, but was to be married and completely faithful to her partner. This century was ruled by â€Å"the belief that an individual’s sex and sexuality form the most basic core of their identity, potentiality, social/political standing, and freedom† (Pg. 1, Ridgway) Lucy Westenra had a completely different mindset as she expressed in a letter to her dear friend Mina. â€Å"Why can’t they let a girl marry three men, or as many as want her, and save all this trouble?† (Pg. 66, Stoker) After Lucy states these words in her letter, she immediately admits to her thoughts and actions being heresy. Just because she confessed Rowatt 4 to this sin against the church and her beliefs does not simply alleviate Lucy’s sexual desire. This difference between Lucy and other nineteenth century virtuous women was not just a phase of rebellion, it was psychological. Lucy is fully aware that she is desired by many men and she lets that get into her head, essentially she is feeding off the attention. This vulnerability and openness is why Lucy Westenra is Count Dracula’s first and easiest target. The first time the Count starts to get into Lucy’s head is after her and Mina see the wrecked boat upon shore, containing the containers of dirt. These were Dracula’s sleeping quarters. This fact was not known by the women at the time, but soon after this event is when Lucy starts to sleep walk. This sleep walking is not a coincidence but is psychologically connected to her sinful desires of lustfulness. Count Dracula only has the power the attack willing victims, which could only mean Lucy knew in her subconscious what she was doing by going out to the cemetery at nights. This spell Dracula puts on Lucy is the same spell he put on the three women who now life in Dracula Castle with him. These women were just as innocent and virtuous as Lucy was and are now sex crazed and evil just as the Count is. This â€Å"spell† was a way to undermine women so that Dracula would feel powerful and controlling over them. In essence, Lucy Westenra was a seemingly virtuous nineteenth century Victorian woman who actually had underlying sexual desires. These desires made Lucy vulnerable to Count Dracula, who was consumed with gaining control over his victims. Because of her lustful manor, Lucy was drawn to the attack of Dracula and fell under his deep spell. From then on there was no turning back. Stoker, Bram. Dracula. 1897. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990. Viragh, Attila. â€Å"Can The Vampire Speak? Dracula As Discourse On Cultural Extinction.† English Literature In Transition, 1880-1920 56.2 (2013): 231-245. MLA International Bibliography. Web. 25 Sept. 2013. Ridgway, Stephan. â€Å"Victorian Sexuality† in â€Å"Sexuality and Modernity† originally written as a lecture for Sociology at Sydney University, 1996. Isis Creations. Web. 12 Nov. 2010. Abraham Van Helsing. (2016, May 08).

Should minors who commit violent crimes be tried as adults Research Paper - 1

Should minors who commit violent crimes be tried as adults - Research Paper Example Has there been a day that a war was crucial in the reputation of a nation and the adults did not reach a decision to give them weapons? This is a clear line drawn between the adults and minors, why then should we conclude that this case is different and this minor deserves equal treatment as adults and be locked away in prisons with the grownups (Bernard, 2010). For years now, history has come to the defense of the minors, nations that have attempted to recruit children in warfare have had the leaders tried or sanctioned. This case has also cut across decades where children have had to face the juvenile system. Why then change this after having proven productive for ages. Currently, the status of this dilemma stipulates that they should be tried separately although there are lawmakers who insist otherwise. Research conducted recently has demonstrated that transfer of minors from the juvenile courts to adult courts has not reached the goal of lowering recidivism, on the contrary, it aggravates the situation by making the crimes increase. The minors have always positioned minors for redemption and reform. Juvenile detention facilities possess the same programs implemented to assist in the reformation process unlike the prisons (Bernard, 2010). Trying them as adults would hurt the economy, some of the verdicts would mean life imprisonments, what good does this do where they feed and pay salary to wardens for their entire life whereas the juvenile facilities would have reformed them and brought them back to the society to be beneficial to entire economy. Minors introduced to the prison system have their social lives terminated and altered to a direction that would otherwise not have been acquired if it were for the juvenile facility. Basically, it is unethical to see children as young as 13 undergo the same hard task and punishment as the seniors, prisons are not friendly places

Martin Luther King jr Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Martin Luther King jr - Essay Example grew up in a society where there was a lot of segregation but he rose up against the social injustices in various ways that even saw him to be recognized as a Nobel Prize winner in the year 1964. This essay will discuss the major inspirations imparted by Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in his career and other activities that aimed at terminating social injustices in the U.S. To start with, Martin Luther King Jr. started reformation towards social justice at early stages in his life, something not very common to many people. Martin Luther King Jr. was born in a family of religious leaders, who advocated for social justice and fairness in the society. As a result, the young Martin Luther King Jr., initially named as Michael King was exposed to social issues that affected American populations. According to the Martin Luther King Jr. Research and Education Institute, the activism of his father against racial discrimination as well as the depression period in the country made Martin Luther King Jr. to be acquainted with the social injustices and economic inequalities in the country (1). Therefore, the nature of the early life of Martin Luther King Jr. made him to develop agitation for fairness to people in the society. What inspires most in this story is that Martin Luther King Jr. did not stop at that but took an initiative against the prevailing injustices . The Martin Luther King Jr. Research and Education Institute points out that following the inspiration from his father as well as other religious leaders, Martin Luther King Jr. took an initiative of being ordained as a church leader and started his political activism by writing letters to editors of national newspapers while still at Morehouse College (1). This is quite inspiring because very few students can take such a bold step at their tender ages as in the case of Martin Luther King Jr. Of more significance, Martin Luther King Jr. was confident to criticize any issue that seemed not right in the